What's New
UCG Concept
UCG Current Developments
UCG & CO2 Sequestration
UCG Web Sites & Publications
Brief History
Contacts
Future
Home Page
|
Environmental Benefits of In-seam Gasification
- Absence of coal and ash handling at surface
- Production of clean gas requiring reduced processing
- High efficiency power generation in gas turbines
- No surface gasifier
Underground Contamination
Trials have shown that small quantities of phenols and benzenes are produced
as by-products of the underground gasification process. Most will be carried to the
surface with the product gas and removed during gas cleaning. Some will be
absorbed by the undisturbed coal and a small proportion will remain in the exhausted cavity
and could be a source of potential contamination for the coal and surrounding
strata.
How far the contaminants will disperse will depend on the hydrogeology,
permeability and geological structure of the coal bed. The hydrogeology of the
target area must be well understood and sites for gasification should only be
selected where the likelihood of contamination dispersal is minimal. This requires
that the proposed UCG site is extensively surveyed at coal seam depth, and monitoring
will probably required during and after gasification operations have taken place.
The leakage of gas from the cavity into the adjacent strata is a further factor
to consider during site selection, although this is only likely to be a problem
with shallow UCG schemes. Low permeability is essential in the target area
and operating pressures of the process should be matched as far as possible to the
hydrostatic pressure to minimise gas escape.
Surface Contamination
The equipment at surface will include the drilling rigs, wellheads, connecting pipework,
and process plant for handling the injection/production gases. A commercial UCG scheme
will require a permanent site for the power plant and access, on a temporay basis, to the
network of wellheads and connecting pipework above the area of coal under gasification.
The use of directional drilling could help to minimises the surface area of land required.
Land restoration programmes should be undertaken as the underlying
coal is used up, but the disruption, unlike open cast mining, will have been minimal.
The plant will need to meet all the necessary environmental requirements of process
and power plant. Detailed environmental impact assessments will be required.
CO2 Sequestration
In-seam gasification offers the possibility that CO2 produced at surface in the
power generation process could be re-injected into the exhausted gasification
cavity or adjacent strata. See separate page on
UCG and CO2 sequestration.
Importance of Depth
Inseam gasification improves with depth in several ways.
Trials have shown that cavity growth and methane production increase with the
depth of gasification. The process at depth is more efficient and air emissions
will be correspondingly less. In addition, the prospects of watercourse
contamination, subsidence, and gas escape will be substantially reduced with a
deeper coal seam.
Offshore Coal Fields
The possibility of gasification of the vast reserves of coal that lie offshore would eliminate
still further the environmental impact of power generation by UCG. The UK,
which has large reserves in the shallow waters of the North Sea, has included a
pre-feasibility study of offshore UCG as part of its current programme.
|